It’s been a little over a year since my colleague, Check Warner, published our AI investing framework. That article sparked fascinating conversations, many of which guided our most exciting investments to date.
Since then, we’ve backed twelve AI-first companies across the application and applied infrastructure layers. We continue to keep pace with developments in the broader AI world – of which GenAI is the latest wave – not only through interactions with exceptional founders but also through our own software and tooling efforts. The latter has been a significant part of my role since I joined Ada Ventures. It includes building a beta version of AdaGPT, a pitch deck feedback app used by over 200 founders per month.
How has our thinking evolved? In this post, I’ll revisit our original framework and highlight how our views have grown. I’ll also share use-case areas we are excited about. This includes our views on reframing edtech, the overlooked consumer category, supporting frontline workers, how GenAI can enter the physical world, and the case for investing in services businesses. Along the way, I’ll touch on GenAI’s real-world traction, its current limitations, and some of the broader social implications.
Our original framework started with a brief definition of AI-first companies. These are businesses where AI is at the core of what makes their products valuable. For example, Ada portfolio company Bilanc uses AI to measure and improve the productivity of both human and AI-powered engineering teams. Bilanc’s product could not exist without LLMs.
We’ve seen this kind of framing before. Previous waves of innovation had categories such as cloud-native (e.g., Salesforce and Snowflake) and mobile-first (e.g., Instagram and Uber). We now have a new category of opportunity with GenAI that holds just as much promise.
As Check wrote, we see this new opportunity of GenAI through the lens of inclusive alpha. In other words, AI-first companies are compelling investment opportunities because they have the potential to deliver substantial financial returns while also increasing access to essential services.
Our investments in fast-growth companies like Medly AI (equitable learning and education through AI tutors) and Valla (consumer access to AI-powered legal support) have reaffirmed our view that significant value will accrue at the application layer. We’ve also found that the scope and scale for positive impact are greater here. Additionally, we’ve noticed that the consumer category remains untapped. We plan to explore this opportunity more deeply.
Meanwhile, we remain optimistic but measured about the applied infrastructure layer. In this category, we recently backed JigsawStack because it solves the messy backend of building AI-powered products. This, too, has an inclusive angle: Jigsawstack’s products enable more people – not just the technical elite – to build and participate in the AI software economy.
On the foundational model side, our stance has hardened. Unless a team is developing a new, capital-efficient, and defensible AI paradigm that captures value across the foundational model and application layers, we’re unlikely to participate as a pre-seed investor.
DeepSeek models – one of the many ruptures to the expensive closed-source alternatives – and the steady stream of free models and data sets published on Hugging Face (there’s a new upload every 10 seconds) are eroding the defensibility of proprietary models. Generative intelligence is fast becoming a commodity.
We continue to believe that the story of AI will mirror the historical journey of electricity. While the original invention was groundbreaking, it was the innovation built on top that transformed everyday lives.
Developers who got early access to GPT-3 in 2020 will remember how it felt like magic. My first use of the model was in its purest form. There was no instruction fine-tuning or reinforcement learning from human feedback, yet the often verbose and off-topic model responses didn’t overshadow a glimpse into astonishing capabilities.
Since that early magic, the GenAI narrative has swung wildly across extremes. We’ve seen existential fear (“we’re cooked”), overblown expectations (“this changes everything!”) and disillusioned disappointment (“GPT4.5 underwhelmed!”). There’s evidence to support parts of each perspective, and this makes navigating the AI world especially erratic.
For instance, the AI job crisis is arguably already here. Video generation has surpassed expectations and is remarkable. However, state-of-the-art models still hallucinate (OpenAI’s o3 model hallucinates more than older models), and real-world productivity gains from GenAI remain uneven: Some randomised control trials have found time savings of 15% or higher while a recent large-scale study of 25,000 workers found an average of 2.8% time savings and no impact on wages.
Still, if you look past the mania, there’s now more clarity about where GenAI can genuinely deliver value. From code and content generation to knowledge retrieval and workflow automation with AI agents, founders are getting a better sense of the capabilities they can build with. We see a leap forward in what’s possible across many use cases. Here’s a sample of areas we are paying attention to.
Edtech has been fixated on the classroom format of learning, and technology has done little more than mask the flaws of a rigid factory-like model from the 1800s. But what if GenAI could go beyond that? There’s scope to impact not only existing modes of teaching abstract knowledge but also applied learning. Consider the following ways in which vocational education can be transformed:
GenAI doesn’t have to be restricted to bits in the digital realm. It can now interface with the physical world. Of course, we’ll need appropriate safety measures and guardrails (more on that later), but extending GenAI into the physical world unlocks even more capabilities. Take these two, for example:
Tradespeople, healthcare employees, leisure and hospitality staff and other deskless workers make up most of the global workforce. However, only a fifth of frontline workers have the tech they need to be productive. They are chronically underserved by technology despite an estimated productivity boost of 22% on average if they were granted the right tools. For these reasons, we are on the lookout for innovation here. Examples?
The bulk of GenAI activity has gone into enterprise software. Taking YC companies as an example (a group that provides a leading indicator on where technology talent is placing its bets), I found that only 10% of AI-first companies founded in the last 2 years were in the consumer category. In Europe, the fraction is halved.
We feel that this is a missed opportunity. Consumer is tough, but founders who break through can achieve incredible outcomes. For GenAI, this will require going beyond single-turn chat-based AI that’s common in enterprise software to high-value, fun interactions that span long time horizons and mixed modalities. To name a few:
Small and medium-sized companies make up 99% of the USA’s and UK’s total number of companies. They account for 46% and 60% of USA and UK employment, respectively. While many startups gravitate toward enterprise customers because of the higher contract values, SMBs still represent a massive opportunity, given their sheer volume and operational needs. This is why the likes of Shopify, Xero, Canva, and Toast are all billion-dollar companies. We believe GenAI will produce new SMB winners, too. Areas of potential include:
We’ve had the world wide web for over three decades, and in that time, society has established robust mechanisms to subvert digital threats. Open standards like TLS encrypt data in transit. Payment authentication protocols like 3D Secure prevent credit card fraud. There are also simple ML classification algorithms that filter email spam. All these tools have helped the world create a resilient security system that enables trust on the web. A similar ecosystem for GenAI is embryonic today. And so we’re on the lookout for founders who are building the missing safety stack. A few promising areas:
AI capabilities are notoriously difficult to predict. At Ada Ventures, our view is to keep an open mind about what might surprise us next while staying focussed on real value creation. We also recognise the limits of our knowledge. We have to ferociously learn from builders who are redefining the frontier of what GenAI can do. So if you have thoughts on this article, we’d love to hear them. And if you’re an AI-first founder building something that feels slightly crazy but is grounded in addressing real-world needs, get in touch!